These results imply the role of mobiles as a mediated extension of battlefield and question the very definition of what constitutes weapon as tool of combat. Mobiles supplant old or unavailable equipment and fill gaps in military infrastructure, becoming weaponized and contributing to the hybridization of the military and the intimate, and of war and peace. A variety of personal purposes, such as private communication and entertainment, are combined in the same device with wiretapping, fire targeting, minefield mapping and combat communication. The omnipresence of mobiles on the battlefield creates a set of unique participatory media practices. ![]() Based on qualitative in-depth interviews with Ukrainian servicemen and women, this article presents a typology for the frontline use of mobiles in the spirit of actor–network theory. In this article, I focus on patterns of use of mobile phones on the frontline in Eastern Ukraine. ![]() One of the problems in the growing subfield of mediatization of war is evidence on how exactly civilian communication devices become integrated with warfare.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |